Turing vs. Outdefine: Remote Job Boards

Choosing the Right Platform for Your Tech Talent Needs

Are you searching for the perfect platform to meet your tech talent needs? Look no further than Outdefine and Turing, two leading platforms in the industry. In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll explore the key features and offerings of both platforms to help you make an informed decision.

Comparative Table: Outdefine vs. Turing

In this table, we’ll compare the key features of Outdefine and Turing side by side, allowing you to quickly grasp the differences between the two platforms.

Now, let’s delve deeper into each aspect to gain a better understanding of what sets these platforms apart.

Talent Diversity

Outdefine stands out for its diverse range of tech roles beyond developers. From software engineers to UX designers to marketers, Outdefine offers opportunities for professionals across various domains. On the other hand, Turing primarily focuses on developers, offering a narrower scope of roles.

Profile Validation Process

When it comes to validating talent profiles, Outdefine takes a rigorous approach. Every user undergoes a 1:1 interview with Outdefine’s Talent team to ensure the accuracy of their identity, skills, and English proficiency. In contrast, Turing’s vetting process is tailored towards developers only, leaving out other tech professionals.

Community Engagement

Outdefine boasts a vibrant community section where users can interact, exchange knowledge, and collaborate with each other. This feature fosters networking and collaboration among tech professionals. However, Turing lacks a community section, missing out on the opportunity for community engagement.

Rewards System

As a tokenized platform, Outdefine offers DEFN token rewards to users for achieving certain milestones within the platform. These tokens can be redeemed for various benefits, enhancing the user experience. Conversely, Turing does not have a reward system in place.

Pricing Transparency

Outdefine prioritizes pricing transparency, offering clear and transparent pricing structures for both companies and talent. However, reports suggest a lack of transparency in Turing’s pricing, which can lead to confusion and uncertainty for users.

Also, Outdefine offers subscription options for every company recruiter profile or needs. You can find solutions and pricing alternatives tailored to independent recruiters, small and medium-sized companies, or even large corporations, who are looking for quality talent in a short time, with verified and qualified talent, and with low commissions. They can pay a fixed amount per month, or pay 10% per hire, agreeing the amount with the talent to be hired. Turing, on the other hand, offers a unique option for companies in which they charge up to %50 (or more taking into account the hidden fees we are talking about).

Personalized Support

Outdefine provides personalized support for talent throughout their job search journey. From resume assistance to interview preparation, Outdefine’s Talent team offers guidance and support every step of the way. Meanwhile, Turing offers limited personalized support for talent, potentially leaving users feeling unsupported.

Start hiring o being hired for tech jobs

This comparative analysis provides valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of both Outdefine and Turing. Whether you’re looking for a diverse talent pool, transparent pricing, or personalized support, understanding the differences between these platforms can help you make the right choice for your tech talent needs.

Ready to explore the opportunities available on Outdefine? Sign up today at app.outdefine.com and take your tech talent search to new heights!